Comments on: 郎咸平：2008中国经济走势

By: vanessa-zhu

vanessa-zhu — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:10:23 +0000

中国现行经济状况， IT is true that the economy development nowadays has a fake downturn. And any economical oppinions might has its points, but acctuarelly,what we need is fuctional acts from all departments-or any experts that he thought he can do something for good. Besides,it is easy said than done,talking and thinking cannot gain a thing! Although we are poor,we are not stupid. (I have a poor spelling in English, sorry for that).

By: 8周刊 » 8周刊［第15期］

8周刊 » 8周刊［第15期］ — Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:11:36 +0000

[...] 《槽边往事》—比特海日志 » Blog Archive » 郎咸平：2008中国经济走势 [...]

By: 小马

小马 — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 14:16:02 +0000

不得不说，这才是真正的经济学家，而不是那些该死的砖家。

为什么政府就不能请这样的人做顾问呢？？？？

By: Jun

Jun — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:21:02 +0000

郎 Money always chases after higher return possible, and two directions are by no means unique to China. Take a look what happens to the oil market today, it is going up and up wile the demand is down and down, and you will understand the tremendous impact of hot money. What 郎 fails to recognize in his answer is that money invested in the manufactory is suppose to be long term (five years and longer) while investment (Real estate, commodity, stock, etc) is short term. Somehow he, and others, seems to believe that one should expect immediate return of any investment. That has never been the case in any industry other than investment. Any Economy, even free market, has its cycles of up and downs. While the impact of the cycle is inevitable and causing pains to all, it flash out the weak ones who just want to get quick returns or don’t know how to manage the downturn, and makes survivors stronger. Chinese manufacture need consolidation and this downturn should help. When you are big enough, bank will go after you and when there are not many small players willing to take 2% profit, the rest can ask for 5% or more.
Economy has never been about happy to all but a few survivors.
Also, we have more than our shares of popular economists, but way too few serious scholars. Maybe Lang should think to become one given he has what it takes. I gave up on “Li Stock” long time ago.

By: dn

dn — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 11:30:35 +0000

写句话给看了篇幅就吓住的朋友,其实跟随作者的思路真的不难,几下就读完了,因为都说的比较浅显,还是应该看一下的.

至于别的,我这个非专业人员就没资格说了.

By: 葱油饼

葱油饼 — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:47:15 +0000

我看完了，也没晕，只是好奇政府高层会怎么反应

By: soleil

soleil — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 09:08:02 +0000

哇，看得晕了，不能坚持看完，不过很想不补金融知识了